PadelTrue

What changed, 2026 to 2027

Nox Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREM 2027 vs Nox EA10 Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREME 2026

No published value that both years state differs. Matching published values: shape, weight, core, face, frame, thickness, textured face.

Nox · 2026

Nox EA10 Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREME 2026 by Edu Alonso

EA10 Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREME 2026

Weight
360 to 375 g (12.7 to 13.2 oz)
Shape
Teardrop

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Delivery country
    Recorded price: €179.99

    6 October 2026 · noxsport.com

    Check the current total at the store.

    Nox · 2027

    Nox Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREM by Edu Alonso 2027

    Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREM 2027

    Weight
    360 to 375 g (12.7 to 13.2 oz)
    Shape
    Teardrop

    See this model’s specifications and buying options.

    Opens the store. Check delivery and returns there.

    Delivery country
      Recorded price: €349.99

      6 October 2026 · noxsport.com

      Check the current total at the store.

      The 2026 model was sold as Nox EA10 Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREME 2026 by Edu Alonso. The 2027 model is sold as Nox Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREM by Edu Alonso 2027. The pairing rule is printed on the overview.

      Spec20262027
      Shape
      Matching published values
      Teardrop
      FORMA: Gota / Lágrima noxsport.com
      Teardrop
      FORMA: Lágrima noxsport.com
      Weight
      Matching published values
      360 to 375 g (12.7 to 13.2 oz)
      PESO: 360 - 375g noxsport.com
      360 to 375 g (12.7 to 13.2 oz)
      PESO: 360 - 375g noxsport.com
      Core
      Matching published values
      Medium-hard, MLD Black Eva
      Intermedio-Duro noxsport.com
      Medium-hard, MLD Black Eva
      TACTO : Medio-Duro noxsport.com
      Face
      Matching published values
      Carbon Fiber 12K Xtrem
      CARA: Carbon Fiber 12K Xtrem noxsport.com
      Carbon Fiber 12K XTREM
      CARA: Carbon Fiber 12K XTREM noxsport.com
      Frame
      Matching published values
      Carbono
      MARCO: Carbono noxsport.com
      Carbono
      MARCO: Carbono noxsport.com
      Thickness
      Matching published values
      38 mm (1.5 in)
      ANCHO: 38 mm noxsport.com
      38 mm (1.5 in)
      ANCHO: 38 mm noxsport.com
      Textured face
      Matching published values
      Yes
      Combinación de dos técnicas de superficie rugosa noxsport.com
      Yes
      dos técnicas avanzadas de superficie rugosa noxsport.com

      Specs as each maker published them, compared word for word after units are read. A value published for only one year is marked "not enough comparable information", never "matching". Materials are named in free text, often in two languages, so a different name is shown as "described differently" with both quotes rather than called a change. Feel is the manufacturer’s description of the racket, not our measurement of foam hardness. When a maker states two different values for one spec, both are shown and neither is counted as a change. Price is left out because the stored price is today's, not the launch price.

      Full pages: Nox EA10 Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREME 2026 and Nox Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREM 2027. Side by side with ratings: compare any two rackets.

      What is the difference between the Nox EA10 Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREME 2026 and the Nox Ventus Hybrid 12K XTREM 2027?

      No published value that both years state differs. Matching published values: shape, weight, core, face, frame, thickness, textured face.

      Should I buy the 2026 or the 2027 version?

      These published specifications do not establish that the two rackets are identical or play the same. Compare the stated differences and the information that is missing or conflicting. If both meet your needs, compare the exact model, delivered price and return terms; try them if possible.

      How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.