Side by side
Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 vs Babolat Counter Veron 2.6
Not lighter on the published specification: both list 365 g plus or minus 10 g. Babolat positions the Veron for a more flexible response, but these pages do not establish a measured difference in whole-racket stiffness.
The short answer
- Power: Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 leans further toward power, 46 against 32. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 gives two conflicting balance categories on its source page, head-heavy in the table and medium in the description. None was recorded, so a neutral midpoint was used.
- Control: Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 leans further toward control, 74 against 58. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 gives two conflicting balance categories on its source page, head-heavy in the table and medium in the description. None was recorded, so a neutral midpoint was used.
- Handling: Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 leans further toward handling, 50 against 30. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 gives two conflicting balance categories on its source page, head-heavy in the table and medium in the description. None was recorded, so a neutral midpoint was used.
- Forgiveness: Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 leans further toward forgiveness, 68 against 60.
- Comfort: Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 leans further toward comfort, 50 against 32. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 gives two conflicting balance categories on its source page, head-heavy in the table and medium in the description. None was recorded, so a neutral midpoint was used.
Ratings closer than 8 points are called level. The model is not more precise than that.
Ratings
| Rating | Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 | Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 46 | 32 |
| Control | 58 | 74 |
| Handling | 30 | 50 |
| Forgiveness | 60 | 68 |
| Comfort | 32 | 50 |
| Value | 14 | 23 |
Published specs, with sources
| Spec | Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 | Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | RoundHead Shape: Roundbabolat.com | RoundForma de la cabeza: Redonda / Con una forma redonda y un amplio punto dulcebabolat.com |
| Weight | 355 to 375 g365 g +/- 10g / 12.88 ozbabolat.com | 355 to 375 gPeso 365 g +/- 10gbabolat.com |
| Balance | High, 270 mm270 mm | head-heavy balancebabolat.com | Conflicting source informationTipo de equilibrio: Cabeza pesada / con un equilibrio medio y un peso bien distribuidobabolat.com |
| Core | X-EVACORE: X-EVAbabolat.com | Black EVANÚCLEO: Black EVAbabolat.com |
| Face | 3K CarbonSURFACE: 3K Carbonbabolat.com | Carbon Flex (carbon and fibreglass weave)SUPERFICIE: Carbono Flex / Carbon Flex: Tejido de dos materiales diferentes en la superficie de la raqueta [...] la potencia explosiva del carbono y la potencia fácil de la fibra dbabolat.com |
| Frame | CarbonFRAME: Carbonbabolat.com | carbonMARCO: Carbonobabolat.com |
| Thickness | 38 mm38 mm / 1.5 inbabolat.com | 38 mmGrosor 38 mmbabolat.com |
| Textured face | YesRaised patterns on the racquet surface combined with a rough finish allows you to hit with more spin and increase control.babolat.com | Yes3D SPIN: Relieves en la superficie de la pala para aumentar los efectos de la bola.babolat.com |
| Price | €320€ 320,00babolat.com | €240€ 240,00 IVA incluidobabolat.com |
Is the Counter Veron 2.6 lighter or softer?
Same listed weight, different construction
| Published detail | Counter Viper 2.6 | Counter Veron 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 365 g ± 10 g | 365 g ± 10 g |
| Face | 3K Carbon | Carbon Flex, combining carbon and fibreglass |
| Core | X-EVA | Black EVA |
| Shape and thickness | Round, 38 mm | Round, 38 mm |
| Balance information | 270 mm; described as head-heavy | Conflicting labels on the checked page; see below |
Sources checked on 29 September 2026: Babolat's Counter Viper 2.6 page and Counter Veron 2.6 page. This comparison uses the exact 2.6 model names, without inferring a release year.
One detail to check before ordering
The Veron page describes medium balance in its introduction but head-heavy balance in its technical table. We cannot resolve that contradiction from the page alone. Do not buy it assuming a lower balance than the Viper. Ask the seller for the actual sample's balance and weight, including the grip and accessories you will use.
A missing balance category in our record contributes a neutral midpoint to the rating formula. That can change the apparent gap between these models. A higher handling score is not evidence that the Veron weighs less.
Which should you try?
Start with the Veron if your reason for switching is the response of an all-carbon face. Babolat's description gives you a reason to compare its mixed-material face, not a guarantee about your results. Include the Viper if you want to compare its different face and core construction in the same session.
If less weight is your main goal, this pair does not establish a lighter model. Ask for the actual unit weight rather than choosing by Viper or Veron in the name. Record compact defensive shots, blocked volleys and preparation for the next ball on the free demo worksheet.
Which one
Choose the Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 if
you prefer this exact sample in a side-by-side trial. Its different face and core are reasons to compare it, not proof it will improve your shots.
Choose the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 if
you want to try the mixed-material face. Check the actual sample: its listed weight is the same as the Viper, and the source gives conflicting balance labels.
Questions
Which has more power, the Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 or the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6?
The Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 leans further toward power, rating 46 against 32 for the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 gives two conflicting balance categories on its source page, head-heavy in the table and medium in the description. None was recorded, so a neutral midpoint was used.
Which is easier on the arm, the Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 or the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6?
The Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 rates 50 for comfort against 32 for the Babolat Counter Viper 2.6. The difference comes from face: hybrid against carbon. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 gives two conflicting balance categories on its source page, head-heavy in the table and medium in the description. None was recorded, so a neutral midpoint was used. This describes feel and physical demand, it is not medical advice.
Which is better for an improving player, the Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 or the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6?
Our model rates the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 as the more forgiving build, 68 against 60. That is calculated from published specs.
Which is cheaper, the Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 or the Babolat Counter Veron 2.6?
The Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 was cheaper when checked: Babolat Counter Viper 2.6 €320 on 28 September 2026, Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 €240 on 28 September 2026.
Is the Counter Veron 2.6 lighter than the Counter Viper 2.6?
Both official pages list 365 g plus or minus 10 g, or 355 to 375 g. Individual rackets can differ within that range. The model names do not establish which shop sample is lighter.
Does Carbon Flex prove that the whole racket is softer?
No. The manufacturer describes the mixed-material face as flexible, but the checked pages do not provide a comparable whole-racket stiffness measurement. Use that description as a reason to try it, not a measured performance result.
Does the Counter Veron 2.6 have a lower balance?
The checked Spanish page contradicts itself: the introduction says medium balance while the technical table says head-heavy. We do not choose one label to promise a lower balance. Ask about the actual racket you intend to buy.
Open this pair in the compare tool