PadelTrue

Side by side

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 vs Adidas Metalbone 2026

What each manufacturer published for the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 and the Adidas Metalbone 2026, side by side, and what the PadelTrue model makes of it.

Babolat · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026

Technical Viper 3.0 2026

Weight
360 to 380 g (12.7 to 13.4 oz)
Shape
Diamond
Balance
270 mm (10.6 in)

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Opens the store. Check delivery and returns there.

Delivery country
    Recorded price: €370

    1 October 2026 · babolat.com

    Check the current total at the store.

    Adidas · 2026

    Adidas Metalbone 2026

    Metalbone 2026

    Weight
    345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz)
    Shape
    Diamond
    Balance
    High

    See this model’s specifications and buying options.

    Opens the store. Check delivery and returns there.

    Delivery country
      Recorded price: €390

      6 October 2026 · allforpadel.com

      Check the current total at the store.

      Ratings

      Calculated from published specs, not a play test. Ratings closer than 8 points are called level. The model is not more precise than that.

      Rating / 100Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026Adidas Metalbone 2026
      Power7078
      Control2610
      Handling4640
      Forgiveness1038
      Comfort2351
      Value99

      Power: This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 has no published balance category (low, medium or high), so a neutral midpoint was used.

      Control: This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 has no published balance category (low, medium or high), so a neutral midpoint was used.

      Comfort: This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 has no published balance category (low, medium or high), so a neutral midpoint was used.

      Published specs, with sources

      SpecBabolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026Adidas Metalbone 2026
      ShapeDiamond
      SourcesHead Shape: Diamond babolat.com
      Diamond
      SourcesShape: Diamond allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      Weight360 to 380 g (12.7 to 13.4 oz)
      Sources370 g +/- 10g / 13.05 oz babolat.com
      345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz)
      SourcesWeight: 345-360 +(0-11,2) Gr allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      Balance270 mm (10.6 in)
      Sources270 mm babolat.com
      High
      SourcesBalance: Head Heavy allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      CoreHard, Hard EVA
      SourcesCORE: Hard EVA babolat.com
      Soft, EVA Soft Performance
      SourcesRubber: Eva Soft Performance / The low-density Soft Performance EVA core provides excellent ball output and consistent comfort throughout play. allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      Face3K Carbon
      SourcesSURFACE: 3K Carbon babolat.com
      Carbon Aluminized 16K
      SourcesFace: Carbon Aluminized 16K allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      FrameCarbon
      SourcesFRAME: Carbon babolat.com
      Not published
      Thickness38 mm (1.5 in)
      Sources38 mm / 1.5 in babolat.com
      38 mm (1.5 in)
      SourcesThickness: 38 Mm allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      Textured faceYes
      SourcesIts rough finish also helps generate spin to add an extra dimension to your offensive game. babolat.com
      Yes
      SourcesSpin Blade Decal features a textured surface that enhances control and allows you to generate more spin on every shot. allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
      Price€370
      Sources€ 370,00 babolat.com
      €390
      Sources€390.00 allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)

      Which one

      Choose the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 if

      its price, its exact version and a trial speak for it. The rating differences on this page rest on an input that one of the two pages does not publish, so they are not a reason to choose either.

      Full Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 page

      Choose the Adidas Metalbone 2026 if

      you want the one our model rates higher for forgiveness. That is a calculation from published specs, not a play test.

      Full Adidas Metalbone 2026 page

      Questions

      Which has more power, the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

      The Adidas Metalbone 2026 leans further toward power, rating 78 against 70 for the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026. The difference comes from weight: 352.5g against 370g. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 has no published balance category (low, medium or high), so a neutral midpoint was used.

      Which is easier on the arm, the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

      The Adidas Metalbone 2026 rates 51 for comfort against 23 for the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026. The difference comes from core: soft against hard, weight: 352.5g against 370g. This is a model estimate, not a measured difference: the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 has no published balance category (low, medium or high), so a neutral midpoint was used. This describes feel and physical demand, it is not medical advice.

      Which is better for an improving player, the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

      Our model rates the Adidas Metalbone 2026 as the more forgiving build, 38 against 10. That is calculated from published specs.

      Which is cheaper, the Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

      The Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 was cheaper when checked: Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 €370 on 1 October 2026, Adidas Metalbone 2026 €390 on 6 October 2026.

      Open this pair in the compare tool

      How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.