Side by side

Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 vs Adidas Metalbone 2026

What each manufacturer published for the Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 and the Adidas Metalbone 2026, side by side, and what the PadelTrue model makes of it.

Oxdog · 2027

Shape illustration

Ultimate Pro Light 2027

Weight: 350 g (12.3 oz)
Shape: Diamond
Balance: High

See buying options →

Full racket page →

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Recorded price: €319

13 October 2026 · Price source: oxdogpadel.com

Check the current total at the store.

Adidas · 2026

Metalbone 2026

Weight: 345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz)
Shape: Diamond
Balance: High

See buying options →

Full racket page →

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Opens the store. Check delivery and returns there.

Delivery country

Recorded price: €390

13 October 2026 · Price source: allforpadel.com

Check the current total at the store.

Ratings

Calculated from published specs, not a play test. Ratings closer than 8 points are called level. The model is not more precise than that.

Rating / 100	Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027	Adidas Metalbone 2026
Power	77	78
Control	10	10
Handling	42	40
Forgiveness	32	38
Comfort	46	51
Value	11	9

Published specs, with sources

Spec	Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027	Adidas Metalbone 2026
Shape	Diamond Sources Shape: Diamond oxdogpadel.com	Diamond Sources Shape: Diamond allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Weight	350 g (12.3 oz) Sources Weight: 350g oxdogpadel.com	345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz) Sources Weight: 345-360 +(0-11,2) Gr allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Balance	High Sources With a high balance oxdogpadel.com	High Sources Balance: Head Heavy allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Textured face	Yes Sources Featuring a sandy surface oxdogpadel.com	Yes Sources Spin Blade Decal features a textured surface that enhances control and allows you to generate more spin on every shot. allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Price	€319 Sources 319 EUR (schema.org offer) oxdogpadel.com	€390 Sources €390.00 allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Core	Not published	Soft, EVA Soft Performance Sources Rubber: Eva Soft Performance / The low-density Soft Performance EVA core provides excellent ball output and consistent comfort throughout play. allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Face	Not published	Carbon Aluminized 16K Sources Face: Carbon Aluminized 16K allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
Thickness	Not published	38 mm (1.5 in) Sources Thickness: 38 Mm allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)

Which one

Choose the Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 if

price or feel decides it for you. The model does not separate these two on the five playing-profile ratings.

Full Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 page

Choose the Adidas Metalbone 2026 if

price or feel decides it for you. The model does not separate these two on the five playing-profile ratings.

Full Adidas Metalbone 2026 page

Questions

Which has more power, the Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

On published specs they are level: Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 rates 77 and Adidas Metalbone 2026 rates 78 for power.

Which is easier on the arm, the Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

They are level for comfort on published specs: 46 and 51.

Which is better for an improving player, the Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

They are level for forgiveness: 32 and 38.

Which is cheaper, the Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 or the Adidas Metalbone 2026?

The Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 was cheaper when checked: Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027 €319 on 13 October 2026, Adidas Metalbone 2026 €390 on 13 October 2026.

Open this pair in the compare tool

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.