PadelTrue

The quick take

Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26

The maker's published specifications, each with its source below. Your own trial decides the fit.

Weight365 to 375 g (12.9 to 13.2 oz)
Balance27 cm (10.6 in)
CoreMedium-hard, MultiEVA
FaceX-Tend Carbon 3K
Thickness38 mm (1.5 in)
Compare racket specifications →

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Change delivery country · other shops

A shop is shown when it publishes a delivery option for your country. Confirm the conditions at the shop. The country never changes a rating.

    Buying your first racket?

    Compare beginner options before choosing.

    Before you choose: Published specifications describe the model. Try the actual racket with your usual grips and fitted weights before choosing.

    Is Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 a match for your game?

    Compare this published build and the alternatives below with the parts of your current racket you want to keep.

    Weight
    365 to 375 g (12.9 to 13.2 oz)
    Firmness
    Medium-hard

    Specifications and sources.

    Based on 3 of 5 published model inputs, not a play test.

    Two nearby profiles, with a difference worth checking

    How these alternatives are selected

    Nearest calculated profiles with at least four published inputs and a documented specification difference. Shop payments and stock do not affect this order. Overlapping weight ranges do not guarantee a lighter individual racket; face materials alone do not establish feel.

    Find other exact models by brand and year →

    Specifications and sources

    Published specifications, not our play-test findings. Each value links to its source.

    Reference price published at bullpadel.com: €379.99 · 6 November 2026. It is not the price of the shop in the buy button.

    SpecPublished valueEvidence
    Weight365 to 375 g (12.9 to 13.2 oz)Peso 365 - 375 g bullpadel.com
    Balance27 cm (10.6 in)
    Shown, not scored. Brands measure balance differently, so a bare figure is not comparable.
    Balance Aprox. 27 cm² bullpadel.com
    CoreMedium-hard, MultiEVATacto Intermedio / Duro bullpadel.com
    FaceX-Tend Carbon 3KComposición exterior X-Tend Carbon 3K bullpadel.com
    Framecarbono de alta resistenciaestructura de carbono de alta resistencia bullpadel.com
    Thickness38 mm (1.5 in)Perfil 38 mm bullpadel.com
    Textured faceYesLa tecnología 3D Grain incorpora un patrón de rugosidad bullpadel.com
    Price€379.99379.99 EUR (schema.org offer) bullpadel.com

    Collection note: Balance is given in cm² ('Aprox. 27 cm²'), which is not a valid unit for balance. It was recorded as 27 cm on the assumption that this is a typo. The model name ends in '26', but the page never states a year, so year is null. The shape is described as 'Geométrica', which is not one of the standard categories. The Wave System text describes a more flexible frame, while the Xplo Core² text stresses greater rigidity and less frame deformation. The page names the association both as 'Asociación Pádel Argentino (APA)' and as 'Asociación de Pádel de Argentina'.

    How our estimates work

    These ratings are calculations from published specifications, not measured playing results or our play tests.

    Power52
    Control50
    Handling46
    Forgiveness35
    Comfort31
    Value7

    Not published for this racket: shape, balance. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

    • Power 52 = shape (not published) 22.5/45 + balance (not published) 17.5/35 + weight (370g) 12/20 = 52 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Control 50 = shape (not published) 30/60 + balance (not published) 20/40 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Handling 46 = balance (not published) 25/50 + weight (370g) 20/50 = 45 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Forgiveness 35 = shape (not published) 22.5/45 + firmness (medium-hard) 8.8/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 31.3 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Comfort 31 = firmness (medium-hard) 10/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (not published) 10/20 + weight (370g) 6/15 = 26 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Value 7 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

    Full methodology and evidence.

    Added to the index on 6 November 2026, read from Bullpadel’s own page that day. All new models, newest first →

    How Bullpadel compares as a brand: Bullpadel vs Nox · Adidas vs Bullpadel · Bullpadel vs Head · Babolat vs Bullpadel · Bullpadel vs Siux

    Closest rackets by calculated profile
    Similar calculated profile for less money

    Questions about the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26

    Is the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 a power or a control racket?

    On its published specification the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 is an all-round racket. It rates 52 for power and 50 for control on the PadelTrue model.

    Is the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 good for beginners?

    It rates 35 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Profesional".

    Is the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 arm-friendly?

    It rates 31 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is on the demanding side of the index. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

    How much does the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 cost?

    €379.99 on bullpadel.com when checked on 6 November 2026.

    How much does the Bullpadel XPLO 02 FIP World Cup Argentina 26 weigh?

    The published weight is 365 to 375 g (12.9 to 13.2 oz).

    How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.