PadelTrue

Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto

A all-round build: teardrop shape, medium core, carbon 12K face. Its highest rating is power at 52. Every figure on this page links to where it was published.

PadelTrue · model v1.0 · built 28 September 2026 · Coki Nieto

all-roundMaker says: advanced
Weight365 to 375 gsource: decathlon.co.uk
BalanceNot published
CoreMedium, Black EVA foamsource: decathlon.co.uk
Frametwin carbon tube with EVA foam insertsource: decathlon.co.uk

Where the build leans

No rating reaches 65. This is a middle-of-the-road build.

What it gives up

  • Comfort 39. Face material (carbon), weight (370g).

Not published for this racket: balance. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

Every spec, with its source

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeTeardropShape: Teardrop. / racket type tear drop decathlon.co.uk
Weight365 to 375 gWeight: 370 g (+/- 5 g). / weight (in g) 361 to 375 g, 370 g decathlon.co.uk
CoreMedium, Black EVA foamCore composition: Medium-density Black EVA foam. / racket foam density medium decathlon.co.uk
Facecarbon 12KFrame composition: 3 layers of fibreglass and 1 layer of 12K carbon fibre. / surface material carbon 12K decathlon.co.uk
Frametwin carbon tube with EVA foam insertracket frame material tube twin carbon tube / Air Foam Frame: EVA foam in the racket's double tubular frame. decathlon.co.uk
Thickness38 mmThickness: 38 mm. decathlon.co.uk
Textured faceYestype of surface rough decathlon.co.uk
Price£109.99Current price £109.99 decathlon.co.uk

Collection note: No model year printed on the page. Balance is contradictory on the same page: Key Features says "Head heavy", the Specifications table and the Features block say "even balance". Balance value left null because the page does not agree with itself.

How each rating was calculated

  • Power 52 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + balance (not published) 17.5/35 + weight (370g) 12/20 = 52 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 50 = shape (teardrop) 30/60 + balance (not published) 20/40 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 46 = balance (not published) 25/50 + weight (370g) 20/50 = 45 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 42 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + firmness (medium) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 40 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 39 = firmness (medium) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (not published) 10/20 + weight (370g) 6/15 = 36 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale

A rating describes what the build favours. It is not a lab measurement or a play test. Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by rating profile

vs Nox AT10 Luxury Genius 18K Alum 2026 · vs Kuikma Hybrid Pro Coki Nieto · vs Siux Diablo Elite 6 · vs Siux Diablo Pro 2026 Royal Blue

Questions about the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto

Is the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto is an all-round racket. It rates 52 for power and 50 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its teardrop shape.

Is the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto good for beginners?

It rates 42 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "advanced".

Is the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto arm-friendly?

It rates 39 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto cost?

£109.99 on decathlon.co.uk when checked on 28 September 2026.

How much does the Kuikma PR Hybrid Carbon Coki Nieto weigh?

The published weight is 365 to 375 g.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.