PadelTrue

The quick take

Siux Astra Hybrid 2026

Siux Astra Hybrid 2026

The maker's published specifications, each with its source below. Your own trial decides the fit.

ShapeTeardrop
BalanceMedium
CoreEVA SOFT
FaceFIBERGLASS 3K
Compare racket specifications →

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Change delivery country · other shops

A shop is shown when it publishes a delivery option for your country. Confirm the conditions at the shop. The country never changes a rating.

    Buying your first racket?

    Compare beginner options before choosing.

    Before you choose: Our record has no measured balance point for this model. Ask to try the racket with your usual grips and fitted weights.

    Is Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 a match for your game?

    Compare this published build and the alternatives below with the parts of your current racket you want to keep.

    Balance
    Medium
    Shape
    Teardrop

    Specifications and sources.

    Based on 3 of 5 published model inputs, not a play test.

    Two nearby profiles, with a difference worth checking

    How these alternatives are selected

    Nearest calculated profiles with at least four published inputs and a documented specification difference. Shop payments and stock do not affect this order. Overlapping weight ranges do not guarantee a lighter individual racket; face materials alone do not establish feel.

    Find other exact models by brand and year →

    Specifications and sources

    Published specifications, not our play-test findings. Each value links to its source.

    Reference price published at siuxpadel.com: €150 · 28 October 2026. It is not the price of the shop in the buy button.

    SpecPublished valueEvidence
    ShapeTeardropForma lágrima siuxpadel.com
    BalanceMediumbalance medio siuxpadel.com
    CoreEVA SOFTEVA SOFT siuxpadel.com
    FaceFIBERGLASS 3KFIBERGLASS 3K siuxpadel.com
    Textured faceYesBRILLO+ARENOSO siuxpadel.com
    Price€150150 EUR (schema.org offer) siuxpadel.com

    Collection note: The model name contains 'Hybrid', but the page states the shape as teardrop in both places ('Forma lágrima' in the description and 'Forma de pala: Lágrima' in the specs), so shape is taken as teardrop. Core firmness is left null because the page does not state it clearly and consistently. The 'Tacto de pala' spec line gives only the foam name 'EVA SOFT'. The description says 'tacto equilibrado', which suggests medium rather than soft. A hardness rating of '4/10' appears under a broken label ('Translation missing: es.hardness'). The finish 'BRILLO+ARENOSO' indicates a mixed gloss and sandy finish, so the rough surface may be only partial. No weight, frame material, thickness or professional player is stated.

    How our estimates work

    These ratings are calculations from published specifications, not measured playing results or our play tests.

    Power50
    Control50
    Handling50
    Forgiveness50
    Comfort50
    Value19

    Not published for this racket: firmness, weight. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

    • Power 50 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + balance (medium) 17.5/35 + weight (not published) 10/20 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Control 50 = shape (teardrop) 30/60 + balance (medium) 20/40 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Handling 50 = balance (medium) 25/50 + weight (not published) 25/50 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Forgiveness 50 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + firmness (not published) 17.5/35 + face material (hybrid) 10/20 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Comfort 50 = firmness (not published) 20/40 + face material (hybrid) 12.5/25 + balance (medium) 10/20 + weight (not published) 7.5/15 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Value 19 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

    Full methodology and evidence.

    Every Siux Astra version of 2026

    The versions the maker sells in the same line and year, with the specifications each one publishes. Ratings are calculated from those specs by our formula, not play-tested.

    ModelShapeWeightBalanceCoreFacePowerControlComfort
    Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 (this page)Teardropnot publishedMediumEVA SOFTFIBERGLASS 3K505050
    Siux Astra Ctrl 2026Roundnot publishedLownot publishedFIBERGLASS 3K189058

    Added to the index on 28 September 2026, read from Siux’s own page that day. All new models, newest first →

    How Siux compares as a brand: Bullpadel vs Siux

    Closest rackets by calculated profile
    Similar calculated profile for less money

    Questions about the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026

    How is the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 different from the Siux Astra Ctrl 2026?

    In the specifications both publish, the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 differs in shape: Teardrop against Round; balance: Medium against Low. Our formula rates it 50 for power, 50 for control and 50 for comfort, against 18, 90 and 58.

    Is the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 a power or a control racket?

    On its published specification the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 is an all-round racket. It rates 50 for power and 50 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its teardrop shape and medium balance.

    Is the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 good for beginners?

    It rates 50 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Intermedio".

    Is the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 arm-friendly?

    It rates 50 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

    How much does the Siux Astra Hybrid 2026 cost?

    €150 on siuxpadel.com when checked on 28 October 2026.

    How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.