PadelTrue

Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0

A power-leaning build: diamond shape, high balance, Carbon 12K Honeycomb face. Its highest rating is power at 82. Every figure on this page links to where it was published.

PadelTrue · model v1.0 · built 28 September 2026

powerdemandingMaker says: Avanzado – Profesional
WeightNot published
CoreNot published
FaceCarbon 12K Honeycombsource: siuxpadel.com
FrameNot published

Where the build leans

  • Power 82. Shape (diamond), balance (high).

What it gives up

  • Control 10. Shape (diamond), balance (high).
  • Handling 30. Balance (high).
  • Forgiveness 24. Shape (diamond), face material (carbon).
  • Comfort 32. Face material (carbon), balance (high).

Not published for this racket: firmness, weight. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

Every spec, with its source

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeDiamondDiamante siuxpadel.com
BalanceHighbalance alto siuxpadel.com
FaceCarbon 12K Honeycombsuperficie de Carbon 12K Honeycomb siuxpadel.com
Textured faceYesacabado satinado con relieve 3D siuxpadel.com
Price€350350 EUR (schema.org offer) siuxpadel.com

Collection note: Feel is given only as a number ('Tacto de pala: 10/10') with no word and no explanation of the scale, so core firmness is left null. The page states no weight, core material, frame material or thickness. '2.0' is an edition label, not a year; the only year on the page is the site copyright (2026), which is not stated as the model year. The spec table also lists 'Balance de pala: ALTO', which agrees with the description.

How each rating was calculated

  • Power 82 = shape (diamond) 45/45 + balance (high) 35/35 + weight (not published) 10/20 = 90 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 10 = shape (diamond) 0/60 + balance (high) 0/40 = 0 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 30 = balance (high) 0/50 + weight (not published) 25/50 = 25 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 24 = shape (diamond) 0/45 + firmness (not published) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 17.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 32 = firmness (not published) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (high) 0/20 + weight (not published) 7.5/15 = 27.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Value 12 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

A rating describes what the build favours. It is not a lab measurement or a play test. Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by rating profile

vs Babolat Technical Viper Soft 3.0 · vs Head Extreme Motion 2025 · vs Nox AT10 Luxury Genius Attack 18K Alum 2026 · vs Nox Genius Attack 18K Alum 2027

Similar profile for less money

Questions about the Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0

Is the Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0 a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0 is a power-oriented racket. It rates 82 for power and 10 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its diamond shape and high balance.

Is the Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0 good for beginners?

It rates 24 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a demanding build. Rackets like this reward clean technique and are usually a poor first racket. The manufacturer lists its level as "Avanzado – Profesional".

Is the Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0 arm-friendly?

It rates 32 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is on the demanding side of the index. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Siux Fenix Pro SE 2.0 cost?

€350 on siuxpadel.com when checked on 28 September 2026.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.