PadelTrue

Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog

A control-leaning build: round shape, low balance, medium core, CARBON 24K face. Its highest rating is control at 90. Every figure on this page links to where it was published.

PadelTrue · model v1.0 · built 28 September 2026

controleasy to moveMaker says: Advanced – Professional
Weight355 to 375 gsource: padelnuestro.com
FaceCARBON 24Ksource: siuxpadel.com
FrameNot published

Where the build leans

  • Control 90. Shape (round), balance (low).
  • Handling 70. Balance (low).

What it gives up

  • Power 18. Shape (round), balance (low).

Every spec, with its source

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeRoundForma de pala: Redonda siuxpadel.com
Weight355 to 375 gCon un peso que oscila entre 355 y 375 gramos padelnuestro.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
BalanceLowBalance de pala: BAJO siuxpadel.com
CoreMedium, EVANúcleo EVA: amortiguación perfecta, gran salida de bola y excelente control del golpe | Dureza: Media padelnuestro.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
FaceCARBON 24KSuperficie de pala: CARBON 24K siuxpadel.com
Price€350350€ siuxpadel.com

Collection note: Official page publishes no weight, core material, frame material or thickness. Weight, core material and core hardness are taken from the retailer padelnuestro.com and marked sourceType retailer. Feel is published only as a numeric scale (5/10). roughSurface is taken from the 'Blade finish' row (SATIN+3D). No 'Season' row on the page; year taken from the product title. The same model is also sold in an Ash Green colourway with an identical specification table (https://www.siuxpadel.com/en/products/siux-trilogy-pro-2026-ash-green).

How each rating was calculated

  • Power 18 = shape (round) 0/45 + balance (low) 0/35 + weight (365g) 10/20 = 10 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 90 = shape (round) 60/60 + balance (low) 40/40 = 100 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 70 = balance (low) 50/50 + weight (365g) 25/50 = 75 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 60 = shape (round) 45/45 + firmness (medium) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 62.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 48 = firmness (medium) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (low) 20/20 + weight (365g) 7.5/15 = 47.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Value 17 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

A rating describes what the build favours. It is not a lab measurement or a play test. Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by rating profile

vs Siux Trilogy Elite 2026 · vs Wilson Endure LS V1 · vs Head Gravity Pro 2024 · vs Siux Astra Ctrl 2026

Similar profile for less money

Questions about the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog

Is the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog is a control-oriented racket. It rates 18 for power and 90 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its round shape and low balance.

Is the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog good for beginners?

It rates 60 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Advanced – Professional".

Is the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog arm-friendly?

It rates 48 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog cost?

€350 on siuxpadel.com when checked on 28 September 2026.

How much does the Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Noir Fog weigh?

The published weight is 355 to 375 g.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.