Kuikma Hybrid Pro Coki Nieto
Shape
- This model
- Hybrid
- Alternative
- Teardrop
The quick take
Vibora Titán Berus 2027
Start with the published weight and shape. Your own trial decides the fit.
ShapeHybrid
Compare racket specifications →
No partner shop delivers this racket to your country yet.
Change delivery country · other shops
A shop is shown when it publishes a delivery option for your country. Confirm the conditions at the shop. The country never changes a rating.
Estimated from your connection. Change it if you order to another country.
No partner shop delivers this racket to your country yet.
Compare other rackets and buying options →
Verified storefronts for your country come first, then other shops. Each group is alphabetical. We do not compare total delivery costs.
Search Amazon.de for this racket ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Search Amazon UK for this racket ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Search Amazon US for this racket ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Compare racket specifications →
We may earn a commission if you buy.
No partner shop delivers this racket to your country yet.
Buying your first racket?
Compare beginner options before choosing.
Before you choose: Our record has no measured balance point for this model. Ask to try the racket with your usual grips and fitted weights.
Is Vibora Titán Berus 2027 a match for your game?
Compare this published build and the alternatives below with the parts of your current racket you want to keep.
- Balance
- Medium
- Shape
- Hybrid
Based on 4 of 5 published model inputs, not a play test.
Two nearby profiles, with a difference worth checking
How these alternatives are selected
Nearest calculated profiles with at least four published inputs and a documented specification difference. Shop payments and stock do not affect this order. Overlapping weight ranges do not guarantee a lighter individual racket; face materials alone do not establish feel.
Nox AT10 Genius 18K Agustín Tapia 2024
Shape
- This model
- Hybrid
- Alternative
- Teardrop
Specifications and sources
Published specifications, not our play-test findings. Each value links to its source.
Recorded comparison price: €360 at viborapadel.com · 14 October 2026. This is not a quote from the shop in the buy button.
| Spec | Published value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | Hybrid | HíBRIDAviborapadel.com |
| Balance | Medium | EL BALANCE MEDIOviborapadel.com |
| Core | Medium, EVA PRO BALANCE | EL NúCLEO EVA PRO BALANCE DE DUREZA MEDIAviborapadel.com |
| Face | CARBONO TWILL | SUS CARAS EN CARBONO TWILLviborapadel.com |
| Frame | CARBONO | CARBONOviborapadel.com |
| Thickness | 38 mm (1.5 in) | 38MMviborapadel.com |
| Textured face | No | LISO BRILLOviborapadel.com |
| Price | €360 | 360 EUR (product meta tag)viborapadel.com |
Collection note: The page does not state a weight. Core firmness appears only in the description text (DE DUREZA MEDIA). The technical sheet has no dedicated hardness or touch line. In the technical sheet, labels and values sit on separate lines (for example Forma / HíBRIDA, Marco / CARBONO), so each verbatim holds only the value text. The description calls it a racket for players seeking offensive performance, while the sheet lists Tipo de juego as POLIVALENTE. The product is marked Fuera de stock. The © 2026 in the footer is the site copyright, not a model year.
How our estimates work
These ratings are calculations from published specifications, not measured playing results or our play tests.
Not published for this racket: weight. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.
- Power 45 = shape (hybrid) 15.7/45 + balance (medium) 17.5/35 + weight (not published) 10/20 = 43.2 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Control 57 = shape (hybrid) 39/60 + balance (medium) 20/40 = 59 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Handling 50 = balance (medium) 25/50 + weight (not published) 25/50 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Forgiveness 47 = shape (hybrid) 29.3/45 + firmness (medium) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 46.8 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Comfort 40 = firmness (medium) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (medium) 10/20 + weight (not published) 7.5/15 = 37.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Value 8 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100
Added to the index on 14 October 2026, read from Vibora’s own page that day. All new models, newest first →
Vibora 2027 lineup: compare the models and the 2026 versions →
Closest rackets by calculated profile
Similar calculated profile for less money
Questions about the Vibora Titán Berus 2027
Is the Vibora Titán Berus 2027 a power or a control racket?
On its published specification the Vibora Titán Berus 2027 is an all-round racket. It rates 45 for power and 57 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its hybrid shape and medium balance.
Is the Vibora Titán Berus 2027 good for beginners?
It rates 47 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "AVANZADO".
Is the Vibora Titán Berus 2027 arm-friendly?
It rates 40 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.
How much does the Vibora Titán Berus 2027 cost?
€360 on viborapadel.com when checked on 14 October 2026.
How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.