PadelTrue

Side by side

Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 vs Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027

What each manufacturer published for the Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 and the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027, side by side, and what the PadelTrue model makes of it.

Siux · 2027

Shape illustration

Valkiria Pro 2027

Weight
340 to 360 g (12.0 to 12.7 oz)
Shape
Teardrop
Balance
Medium

See this model’s specifications and buying options.

Delivery country
    Recorded price: €359.95

    25 October 2026 · Price source: siuxpadel.com

    Check the current total at the store.

    Nox · 2027

    Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite by Agustín Tapia 2027

    Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027

    Weight
    350 to 360 g (12.3 to 12.7 oz)
    Shape
    Teardrop

    See this model’s specifications and buying options.

    Delivery country
      Recorded price: €349.99

      20 October 2026 · Price source: noxsport.com

      Check the current total at the store.

      Ratings

      Calculated from published specs, not a play test. Ratings closer than 8 points are called level. The model is not more precise than that.

      Rating / 100Siux Valkiria Pro 2027Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027
      Power4547
      Control5050
      Handling6258
      Forgiveness5056
      Comfort5458
      Value99

      Published specs, with sources

      SpecSiux Valkiria Pro 2027Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027
      ShapeTeardrop
      SourcesForma de pala Lágrima siuxpadel.com
      Teardrop
      SourcesFORMA: Lágrima noxsport.com
      Weight340 to 360 g (12.0 to 12.7 oz)
      Sourcespeso reducido de 340–360 g siuxpadel.com
      350 to 360 g (12.3 to 12.7 oz)
      SourcesPESO: 350 - 360g noxsport.com
      BalanceMedium
      SourcesBalance de pala Medio siuxpadel.com
      Not published
      CoreEVA Soft
      SourcesNúcleo EVA Soft siuxpadel.com
      Soft, HR3 WHITE EVA
      SourcesEl núcleo HR3 White EVA ofrece un tacto soft noxsport.com
      Textured faceYes
      Sourcestextura 3D siuxpadel.com
      Yes
      Sourcescombina dos técnicas avanzadas de superficie rugosa noxsport.com
      Price€359.95
      Sources359.95 EUR (schema.org offer) siuxpadel.com
      €349.99
      Sources349.99 EUR (schema.org offer) noxsport.com
      FaceNot publishedCarbon Fiber 12K Alum XTREM
      SourcesCARA: Carbon Fiber 12K Alum XTREM noxsport.com
      FrameNot publishedCarbono
      SourcesMARCO: Carbono noxsport.com
      ThicknessNot published38 mm (1.5 in)
      SourcesANCHO: 38 mm noxsport.com

      Which one

      Choose the Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 if

      price or feel decides it for you. The model does not separate these two on the five playing-profile ratings.

      Full Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 page

      Choose the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 if

      price or feel decides it for you. The model does not separate these two on the five playing-profile ratings.

      Full Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 page

      Questions

      Which has more power, the Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 or the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027?

      On published specs they are level: Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 rates 45 and Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 rates 47 for power.

      Which is easier on the arm, the Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 or the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027?

      They are level for comfort on published specs: 54 and 58.

      Which is better for an improving player, the Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 or the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027?

      They are level for forgiveness: 50 and 56.

      Which is cheaper, the Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 or the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027?

      The Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 was cheaper when checked: Siux Valkiria Pro 2027 €359.95 on 25 October 2026, Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 €349.99 on 20 October 2026.

      Open this pair in the compare tool

      How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.