PadelTrue

Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027

A all-round build: teardrop shape, soft core, Carbon Fiber 12K Alum XTREM face. Its highest rating is handling at 58. Every figure on this page links to where it was published.

PadelTrue · model v1.0 · built 28 September 2026 · Agustín Tapia

all-roundMaker says: Avanzado
Weight350 to 360 gsource: noxsport.com
BalanceNot published
CoreSoft, HR3 WHITE EVAsource: noxsport.com
FaceCarbon Fiber 12K Alum XTREMsource: noxsport.com

Where the build leans

No rating reaches 65. This is a middle-of-the-road build.

What it gives up

No rating falls below 40.

Not published for this racket: balance. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

Every spec, with its source

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeTeardropFORMA: Lágrima noxsport.com
Weight350 to 360 gPESO: 350 - 360g noxsport.com
CoreSoft, HR3 WHITE EVAEl núcleo HR3 White EVA ofrece un tacto soft noxsport.com
FaceCarbon Fiber 12K Alum XTREMCARA: Carbon Fiber 12K Alum XTREM noxsport.com
FrameCarbonoMARCO: Carbono noxsport.com
Thickness38 mmANCHO: 38 mm noxsport.com
Textured faceYescombina dos técnicas avanzadas de superficie rugosa noxsport.com
Price€349.99349.99 EUR (schema.org offer) noxsport.com

Collection note: The 38 mm figure is labeled ANCHO (width) rather than thickness, recorded as thickness since that is the usual meaning for this value. The page states no balance. It only mentions the Weight Balance system for adjusting weight and balance. The description calls the model "Luxury Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite" while the title omits Luxury. The Innovación section labels the anti-vibration system "VSC" while its text and the rest of the page say "VCS".

How each rating was calculated

  • Power 47 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + balance (not published) 17.5/35 + weight (355g) 6/20 = 46 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 50 = shape (teardrop) 30/60 + balance (not published) 20/40 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 58 = balance (not published) 25/50 + weight (355g) 35/50 = 60 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 56 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + firmness (soft) 35/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 57.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 58 = firmness (soft) 40/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (not published) 10/20 + weight (355g) 10.5/15 = 60.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Value 13 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

A rating describes what the build favours. It is not a lab measurement or a play test. Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by rating profile

vs Tecnifibre Curva Power 2026 · vs Babolat Air Veron 2.6 · vs Wilson Bela LS V3 · vs Nox Pro Cup HARD 2027

Similar profile for less money

Questions about the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027

Is the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 is an all-round racket. It rates 47 for power and 50 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its teardrop shape.

Is the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 good for beginners?

It rates 56 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Avanzado".

Is the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 arm-friendly?

It rates 58 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 cost?

€349.99 on noxsport.com when checked on 28 September 2026.

How much does the Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite 2027 weigh?

The published weight is 350 to 360 g.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.