PadelTrue

Guide

Which padel racket not to buy

Most guides tell you what to buy. This one tells you what to leave on the shelf, and why. No racket here is bad. Each is the wrong choice for a particular buyer.

Updated 29 September 2026. Rebuilt from the index every time a spec or a price changes.

1. A newer model bought without checking the changes

A higher model year is not a buying reason on its own. Compare the exact versions, including changes outside the fields in our rating model.

Model2026 price2027 priceExtra for 2027What changed in the published specs
Nox Genius Attack 18K Alum€199.99€389.99+€190No differences in the available fields compared here.
Nox Genius 18K Alum€229.99€389.99+€160Stated feel: medium in 2026, medium-hard in 2027.
Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM€229.99€389.99+€160Core: HR3 Black EVA in 2026, MLD Black EVA in 2027.
Nox Genius Attack 12K Alum XTREM€199.99€389.99+€190Core: HR3 Black EVA in 2026, MLD Black EVA in 2027.
Nox Pro Cup SOFT€149.99€199.99+€50No differences in the available fields compared here.
Nox Equation HARD Advanced€99.99€124.99+€25No differences in the available fields compared here.
Bullpadel Vertex 05€249.99€349.99+€100No differences in the available fields compared here. Balance is published for 2026 only.

Prices as last checked, both from the maker's own store. The 2026 prices are reduced from their list price. This table compares selected spec fields, not every technology or construction detail. Matching fields do not prove identical rackets. Follow each model to see its sources.

For example, Nox describes a new VCS handle system and revised aerodynamics for its Genius 18K Alum 2027. Those features are not captured by this table. We have not independently tested their effect.

Consider the older model if it suits you, the saving matters, and you do not need the new features. Check stock, delivered price and the exact model before deciding. See the 18K 2027 vs 2026 comparison. Asked here: thread 1, thread 2, thread 3.

2. A pro racket, if you are new to padel

The rackets that fill social media are built for professionals. Diamond shape, high balance, firm feel. They rate lowest for forgiveness in the whole index.

How this list is chosen. Rackets with at least 4 of 5 inputs published, sorted by forgiveness rating, lowest first. Nothing is hand-picked, and the rule is applied to every racket in the index on each build.

Shape
Wilson Bela Pro V2.5
Wilson
Diamond 8410261015 29 €144.95
Bullpadel Vertex 05 Geo 2026
Bullpadel · 2026
Diamond 8410261015 21 €199.95
Siux Fenix Pro 5 Black
Siux
Diamond 8210301016 17 €250
Oxdog Ultimate Pro+ 2026
Oxdog · 2026
Diamond 8410261015 12 €339
Siux Fenix Pro 2026 Glow Purple
Siux · 2026
Diamond 8210301016 12 €350
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026
Babolat · 2026
Diamond 7026461023 12 €370
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 2026
Adidas · 2026
Diamond 7810401019 12 €390
Babolat Viper Juan Lebrón 3.0 2026
Babolat · 2026
Diamond 7026461023 11 €390

Skip these if you have played for less than a year. Babolat says of its own diamond range that it "has less control and precision than the other two Babolat ranges, which is a limiting factor for padel beginners". Asked here: thread 1, thread 2, thread 3.

3. The firmest builds, if your arm already hurts

Firm feel, carbon face, high balance and more weight all ask more of the arm.

How this list is chosen. Rackets with at least 4 of 5 inputs published, sorted by comfort rating, lowest first. Nothing is hand-picked, and the rule is applied to every racket in the index on each build.

Shape
Wilson Bela Pro V2.5
Wilson
Diamond 8410261015 29 €144.95
Bullpadel Vertex 05 Geo 2026
Bullpadel · 2026
Diamond 8410261015 21 €199.95
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 2026
Oxdog · 2026
Teardrop 6634262815 12 €319
Oxdog Ultimate Pro+ 2026
Oxdog · 2026
Diamond 8410261015 12 €339
Siux Fenix Pro 5 Black
Siux
Diamond 8210301016 17 €250
Siux Fenix Pro 2026 Glow Purple
Siux · 2026
Diamond 8210301016 12 €350
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 2026
Adidas · 2026
Diamond 7810401019 12 €390
Bullpadel Neuron 02 2026
Bullpadel · 2026
Hybrid 4657463323 22 €174.95

Skip these if you have elbow, wrist or shoulder pain. This describes feel and physical demand. It is not medical advice. See the comfort guide for the other end of the list.

4. A racket chosen for its carbon number

18K is not better than 12K, and 12K is not better than 3K. The number counts the filaments in a carbon bundle. Makers give different accounts of what it does, and the engineering evidence says it has little direct effect. Skip any racket whose main selling point is a higher K. Details in claims vs measurements.

5. A racket that is too cheap to be real

Popular models are copied. One player posted a white "Nox AT10 18K" with the player's name misspelled on the frame and no rough finish on the face. Asked here: thread 1, thread 2. Skip any listing far below the price in the maker's own store, from a seller the maker does not list. Every racket page here shows the maker's current price, so you can compare.

What to buy instead

Start from your level in best padel rackets 2026, or answer three questions on the home page.

Questions

Which padel rackets should a beginner avoid?

Diamond shaped rackets with a high balance and a firm feel. They are built for advanced players and rate lowest for forgiveness. The list on this page names them.

Is the 2027 version of a padel racket better than the 2026 version?

It depends on the exact model and your needs. A matching shape, weight or face material does not rule out a changed mould or handle system. Compare the maker descriptions and dated prices; our calculated ratings do not measure every change.

How do I spot a fake padel racket?

Compare the price with the maker's own store and buy from a seller the maker lists. Players have reported copies with misspelled names and missing surface texture.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.