PadelTrue

Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026

A control-leaning build: round shape, medium balance, medium-hard core, Fiber Glass 3K face. Its highest rating is control at 74. Every figure on this page links to where it was published.

PadelTrue · model v1.0 · built 28 September 2026

controlMaker says: Intermedio
Weight355 to 365 gsource: noxsport.com
CoreMedium-hard, HR3 Hard EVAsource: noxsport.com
FaceFiber Glass 3Ksource: noxsport.com

Where the build leans

  • Control 74. Shape (round).

What it gives up

  • Power 30. Shape (round), weight (360g).

Every spec, with its source

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeRoundFORMA: Redonda noxsport.com
Weight355 to 365 gPESO: 355 - 365g noxsport.com
BalanceMediumCon balance medio, marco de carbono y sistema antivibraciones noxsport.com
CoreMedium-hard, HR3 Hard EVANÚCLEO: HR3 HARD EVA. Tacto: Intermedio-Duro noxsport.com
FaceFiber Glass 3KCARA: Fiber Glass 3K noxsport.com
FrameCarbonMARCO: Carbono noxsport.com
Thickness38 mmANCHO: 38 mm noxsport.com
Textured faceYesSUPERFICIE: Exclusive Spin. EXCLUSIVE SPIN: Tecnología que incluye dos tipos de acabado rugoso en la superficie de la cara: el 3D hexagonal ubicado en el centro de la pala y el aca noxsport.com
Price€99.9999,99 € 124,99 € -20% noxsport.com

Collection note: Core hardness value is taken from the page's 'Tacto' field, which Nox publishes for the racket as a whole, not for the foam alone. 'Intermedio-Duro' recorded as medium-hard. The product title carries no year, 2026 is taken from the store's own product tag 'palas2026'; a 2027 version exists at /products/equation-hard-advanced-2027 at 124,99 €. Struck-through price shown is 124,99 €.

How each rating was calculated

  • Power 30 = shape (round) 0/45 + balance (medium) 17.5/35 + weight (360g) 8/20 = 25.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 74 = shape (round) 60/60 + balance (medium) 20/40 = 80 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 54 = balance (medium) 25/50 + weight (360g) 30/50 = 55 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 61 = shape (round) 45/45 + firmness (medium-hard) 8.8/35 + face material (hybrid) 10/20 = 63.8 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 43 = firmness (medium-hard) 10/40 + face material (hybrid) 12.5/25 + balance (medium) 10/20 + weight (360g) 9/15 = 41.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Value 52 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

A rating describes what the build favours. It is not a lab measurement or a play test. Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by rating profile

vs Nox Equation HARD Advanced 2027 · vs Adidas Cross IT Light 2026 · vs Nox ML10 Ventus Control 3K 2026 · vs Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027

Similar profile for less money

Questions about the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026

Is the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 is a control-oriented racket. It rates 30 for power and 74 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its round shape and medium balance.

Is the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 good for beginners?

It rates 61 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Intermedio".

Is the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 arm-friendly?

It rates 43 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 cost?

€99.99 on noxsport.com when checked on 28 September 2026.

How much does the Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 weigh?

The published weight is 355 to 365 g.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.