PadelTrue

The quick take

Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026

Start with the published weight and shape. Your own trial decides the fit.

Weight345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz)
ShapeRound
Compare racket specifications →

No partner shop delivers this racket to your country yet.

Change delivery country · other shops

A shop is shown when it publishes a delivery option for your country. Confirm the conditions at the shop. The country never changes a rating.

    Buying your first racket?

    Compare beginner options before choosing.

    Before you choose: Our record has no measured balance point for this model. Ask to try the racket with your usual grips and fitted weights.

    Is Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 a match for your game?

    Compare this published build and the alternatives below with the parts of your current racket you want to keep.

    Weight
    345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz)
    Shape
    Round

    Specifications and sources.

    Based on 4 of 5 published model inputs, not a play test.

    Two nearby profiles, with a difference worth checking

    How these alternatives are selected

    Nearest calculated profiles with at least four published inputs and a documented specification difference. Shop payments and stock do not affect this order. Overlapping weight ranges do not guarantee a lighter individual racket; face materials alone do not establish feel.

    Find other exact models by brand and year →

    Specifications and sources

    Published specifications, not our play-test findings. Each value links to its source.

    Recorded comparison price: €300 at allforpadel.com · 13 October 2026. This is not a quote from the shop in the buy button.

    SpecPublished valueEvidence
    ShapeRoundround shape allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
    Weight345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz)345-360 Gr (Light Weight) allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
    CoreMedium, EVA Soft Energy
    The product page names the foam and does not rate it. The firmness comes from the maker's own guide, which ranks its three foams: From most to least rigid there is EVA High Memory, EVA Soft Energy and EVA Soft Performance. adidas padel guide. The softest is recorded as soft, the middle as medium, the firmest as hard.
    Eva Soft Energy allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
    Face24K Aluminized CarbonCarbon Aluminized 24K allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
    FrameCarbon FiberCarbon Fiber structure allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
    Thickness38 mm (1.5 in)38 Mm allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)
    Price€300300 EUR (product meta tag) allforpadel.com (retailer listing, not the manufacturer)

    Collection note: The product title names the player as Martita Ortega, while the description says Marta Ortega. These appear to be the same player. The balance is given as Even, which is not one of the listed balance words, so value is null. Core firmness is not stated in a Touch, Feel or Hardness line. Soft appears only in the foam name Eva Soft Energy, so no firmness is recorded. Level is PRO even though the racket is marketed as a light control model. Spin Blade Mold is described as aiding spin generation, but the page never states that the surface is rough. The year comes from the Collection: 2026 line.

    How our estimates work

    These ratings are calculations from published specifications, not measured playing results or our play tests.

    Power28
    Control74
    Handling60
    Forgiveness60
    Comfort43
    Value12

    Not published for this racket: balance. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

    • Power 28 = shape (round) 0/45 + balance (not published) 17.5/35 + weight (352.5g) 5/20 = 22.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Control 74 = shape (round) 60/60 + balance (not published) 20/40 = 80 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Handling 60 = balance (not published) 25/50 + weight (352.5g) 37.5/50 = 62.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Forgiveness 60 = shape (round) 45/45 + firmness (medium) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 62.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Comfort 43 = firmness (medium) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (not published) 10/20 + weight (352.5g) 11.3/15 = 41.3 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
    • Value 12 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

    Full methodology and evidence.

    How Adidas compares as a brand: Adidas vs Bullpadel · Adidas vs Nox

    Closest rackets by calculated profile
    Similar calculated profile for less money

    Questions about the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026

    Is the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 a power or a control racket?

    On its published specification the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 is a control-oriented racket. It rates 28 for power and 74 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its round shape.

    Is the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 good for beginners?

    It rates 60 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "PRO".

    Is the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 arm-friendly?

    It rates 43 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

    How much does the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 cost?

    €300 on allforpadel.com when checked on 13 October 2026.

    How much does the Adidas Cross It Light Milano 2026 weigh?

    The published weight is 345 to 360 g (12.2 to 12.7 oz).

    How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.