PadelTrue

Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027

A control-leaning build: round shape, medium balance, medium core, Fibra de vidrio 3K face. Its highest rating is control at 74. Every figure on this page links to where it was published.

PadelTrue · model v1.0 · built 28 September 2026

controlforgivingMaker says: Intermedio
Weight355 to 365 gsource: noxsport.com
CoreMedium, HR3 SOFT EVAsource: noxsport.com
FaceFibra de vidrio 3Ksource: noxsport.com

Where the build leans

  • Control 74. Shape (round).
  • Forgiveness 68. Shape (round).

What it gives up

  • Power 30. Shape (round), weight (360g).

Every spec, with its source

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeRoundFORMA: Redonda noxsport.com
Weight355 to 365 gPESO: 355 - 365g noxsport.com
BalanceMediumbalance medio noxsport.com
CoreMedium, HR3 SOFT EVATACTO : Intermedio noxsport.com
FaceFibra de vidrio 3KCARA: Fibra de vidrio 3K noxsport.com
FrameCarbonoMARCO: Carbono noxsport.com
Thickness38 mmANCHO: 38 mm noxsport.com
Textured faceYesdos tipos de acabado rugoso en la superficie de la cara noxsport.com
Price€124.99124.99 EUR (schema.org offer) noxsport.com

Collection note: The model name says SOFT and the core is named HR3 SOFT EVA, but the page states the feel as intermedio in both the spec table (TACTO : Intermedio) and the description (tacto intermedio). Core value follows the stated feel. The 38 mm value is labelled ANCHO (width) rather than thickness. Balance comes only from the description (balance medio), as the spec table has no balance line. The rough surface comes from the generic TEXTURE 3D technology description, with SUPERFICIE: 3D Texture in the spec table. The product is marked Coming Soon.

How each rating was calculated

  • Power 30 = shape (round) 0/45 + balance (medium) 17.5/35 + weight (360g) 8/20 = 25.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 74 = shape (round) 60/60 + balance (medium) 20/40 = 80 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 54 = balance (medium) 25/50 + weight (360g) 30/50 = 55 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 68 = shape (round) 45/45 + firmness (medium) 17.5/35 + face material (hybrid) 10/20 = 72.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 51 = firmness (medium) 20/40 + face material (hybrid) 12.5/25 + balance (medium) 10/20 + weight (360g) 9/15 = 51.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Value 43 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

A rating describes what the build favours. It is not a lab measurement or a play test. Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by rating profile

vs Babolat Counter Veron 2.6 · vs Adidas Metalbone Carbon Ctrl 2026 · vs Nox Equation Hard Advanced 2026 · vs Nox Equation HARD Advanced 2027

Similar profile for less money

Questions about the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027

Is the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027 a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027 is a control-oriented racket. It rates 30 for power and 74 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its round shape and medium balance.

Is the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027 good for beginners?

It rates 68 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a forgiving build, the kind usually recommended to newer players. The manufacturer lists its level as "Intermedio".

Is the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027 arm-friendly?

It rates 51 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027 cost?

€124.99 on noxsport.com when checked on 28 September 2026.

How much does the Nox Equation SOFT Advanced 2027 weigh?

The published weight is 355 to 365 g.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.