PadelTrue

The quick take

Siux Electra Pro IT 2026

Start with the published weight and shape. Your own trial decides the fit.

ShapeTeardrop

€350Recorded price · 30 September 2026

Price source: siuxpadel.com. Check the current total at the store.

Check current price at siuxpadel.com ↗

Opens the store. Check delivery and returns there.
Direct link; we do not earn from this purchase.

Buying your first racket?

Compare beginner options before choosing.

Before you choose: Our record has no measured balance point for this model. Ask to try the racket with your usual grips and fitted weights.

Specifications and sources

Published specifications, not our play-test findings. Each value links to its source.

SpecPublished valueEvidence
ShapeTeardropForma de pala: Lágrima siuxpadel.com
BalanceMediumBalance de pala: MEDIO siuxpadel.com
CoreEVANúcleo: EVA siuxpadel.com
FaceCarbono 12KCaras: Carbono 12K siuxpadel.com
FrameCarbono 3KMarco: Carbono 3K siuxpadel.com
Textured faceYesAcabado de pala: ARENOSO siuxpadel.com
Price€350350 EUR (schema.org offer) siuxpadel.com

Collection note: Feel is given only as a number ('Tacto de pala: 8/10'), not as a firmness word, so core.value is null. The description says 'juego híbrido de potencia y control', but this refers to playing style, not shape. The shape field says 'Lágrima'. 'Tipo de juego: POTENCIA' lists only power, while the description mentions power and control. The description calls the model 'Electra Pro IT 26', while the title and 'Temporada: 2026' use 2026. The surface is listed as both 'Caras: Carbono 12K' and 'Superficie de pala: CARBON 12K', and these agree. No weight, thickness or player is stated.

How our estimates work

These ratings are calculations from published specifications, not measured playing results or our play tests.

Power50
Control50
Handling50
Forgiveness42
Comfort40
Value11

Not published for this racket: firmness, weight. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.

  • Power 50 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + balance (medium) 17.5/35 + weight (not published) 10/20 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Control 50 = shape (teardrop) 30/60 + balance (medium) 20/40 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Handling 50 = balance (medium) 25/50 + weight (not published) 25/50 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Forgiveness 42 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + firmness (not published) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 40 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Comfort 40 = firmness (not published) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (medium) 10/20 + weight (not published) 7.5/15 = 37.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
  • Value 11 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100

Full methodology and evidence.

Closest rackets by calculated profile
Similar calculated profile for less money

Questions about the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026

Is the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026 a power or a control racket?

On its published specification the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026 is an all-round racket. It rates 50 for power and 50 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its teardrop shape and medium balance.

Is the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026 good for beginners?

It rates 42 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Avanzado – Profesional".

Is the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026 arm-friendly?

It rates 40 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.

How much does the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026 cost?

€350 on siuxpadel.com when checked on 30 September 2026.

How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.