Kuikma Hybrid Pro Coki Nieto
Weight
- This model
- 355 to 375 g (12.5 to 13.2 oz)
- Alternative
- 360 to 370 g (12.7 to 13.1 oz)
The quick take
Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026
The maker's published specifications, each with its source below. Your own trial decides the fit.
Weight355 to 375 g (12.5 to 13.2 oz)
ShapeTeardrop
BalanceMedium
CoreEVA
FaceCarbono 12K
Compare racket specifications →
See this model’s specifications and buying options.
Change delivery country · other shops
A shop is shown when it publishes a delivery option for your country. Confirm the conditions at the shop. The country never changes a rating.
Estimated from your connection. Change it if you order to another country.
No partner shop delivers this racket to your country yet.
Compare other rackets and buying options →
Verified storefronts for your country come first, then other shops. Each group is alphabetical. We do not compare total delivery costs.
See this racket on Amazon.es ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
See this racket on Amazon.ae ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
See this racket on Amazon.sa ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
See this racket on Amazon.de ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
See this racket on Amazon UK ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
See this racket on Amazon US ↗
Opens an Amazon search, not one checked product page. Pick the exact model and year there. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Compare racket specifications →
We may earn a commission if you buy.
No partner shop delivers this racket to your country yet.
Buying your first racket?
Compare beginner options before choosing.
Before you choose: Our record has no measured balance point for this model. Ask to try the racket with your usual grips and fitted weights.
Is Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 a match for your game?
Compare this published build and the alternatives below with the parts of your current racket you want to keep.
- Weight
- 355 to 375 g (12.5 to 13.2 oz)
- Balance
- Medium
Based on 4 of 5 published model inputs, not a play test.
Two nearby profiles, with a difference worth checking
How these alternatives are selected
Nearest calculated profiles with at least four published inputs and a documented specification difference. Shop payments and stock do not affect this order. Overlapping weight ranges do not guarantee a lighter individual racket; face materials alone do not establish feel.
Nox AT10 Genius 12K 2025
Weight
- This model
- 355 to 375 g (12.5 to 13.2 oz)
- Alternative
- 360 to 375 g (12.7 to 13.2 oz)
Specifications and sources
Published specifications, not our play-test findings. Each value links to its source.
Reference price published at siuxpadel.com: €350 · 28 October 2026. It is not the price of the shop in the buy button.
| Spec | Published value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | Teardrop | Lágrimasiuxpadel.com |
| Weight | 355 to 375 g (12.5 to 13.2 oz) | Peso 355-375 gsiuxpadel.com |
| Balance | Medium | balance mediosiuxpadel.com |
| Core | EVA | Núcleo: EVAsiuxpadel.com |
| Face | Carbono 12K | Caras: Carbono 12Ksiuxpadel.com |
| Frame | Carbono 3K | Marco: Carbono 3Ksiuxpadel.com |
| Textured face | Yes | acabado Matte + Sandsiuxpadel.com |
| Price | €350 | 350 EUR (schema.org offer)siuxpadel.com |
Collection note: The description spells the shape 'Forma lácrima', which appears to be a typo. The spec line 'Forma de pala: Lágrima' was used for shape. Firmness is given only as a number ('tacto 8/10', 'Tacto de pala: 8/10') with no word such as blando, medio or duro, so core.value is null. The spec table also lists the finish as 'ARENOSO', which is consistent with 'Matte + Sand'. Other listed specs: 'Tipo de juego: POTENCIA', 'Gama: PRO'. The page calls the model a special edition ('Edición especial'). Thickness is not stated.
How our estimates work
These ratings are calculations from published specifications, not measured playing results or our play tests.
Not published for this racket: firmness. Each missing input counts as the neutral midpoint, so treat these ratings as less certain than for a racket with all five.
- Power 50 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + balance (medium) 17.5/35 + weight (365g) 10/20 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Control 50 = shape (teardrop) 30/60 + balance (medium) 20/40 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Handling 50 = balance (medium) 25/50 + weight (365g) 25/50 = 50 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Forgiveness 42 = shape (teardrop) 22.5/45 + firmness (not published) 17.5/35 + face material (carbon) 0/20 = 40 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Comfort 40 = firmness (not published) 20/40 + face material (carbon) 0/25 + balance (medium) 10/20 + weight (365g) 7.5/15 = 37.5 points, placed on the 10 to 90 scale
- Value 8 = mean of the two highest ratings, divided by the price in euros, scaled so the best value in the index is 100
Every Siux Electra version of 2026
The versions the maker sells in the same line and year, with the specifications each one publishes. Ratings are calculated from those specs by our formula, not play-tested.
| Model | Shape | Weight | Balance | Core | Face | Power | Control | Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 (this page) | Teardrop | 355 to 375 g | Medium | EVA | Carbono 12K | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Siux Electra Elite 2026 | Teardrop | not published | Medium | EVA Soft | CARBON 3K | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Siux Electra Pro IT 2026 | Teardrop | not published | Medium | EVA | Carbono 12K | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Siux Electra ST2 Flex 2026 | Teardrop | not published | Medium | Medium-soft, EVA Soft | Fibra de vidrio | 50 | 50 | 68 |
| Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red | Teardrop | not published | Medium | Medium-hard, EVA Soft | CARBON 12K | 50 | 50 | 32 |
| Siux Electra Pro 2026 Shadow Red | Teardrop | 355 to 375 g | Medium | Hard, Eva | CARBON 12K | 50 | 50 | 24 |
Added to the index on 28 September 2026, read from Siux’s own page that day. All new models, newest first →
How Siux compares as a brand: Bullpadel vs Siux
Closest rackets by calculated profile
Similar calculated profile for less money
Questions about the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026
How is the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 different from the Siux Electra Pro IT 2026?
In the specifications both publish (shape, weight, balance, core and face), the maker lists the same values. Any difference is in what it does not publish, so try both if you can.
Is the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 a power or a control racket?
On its published specification the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 is an all-round racket. It rates 50 for power and 50 for control on the PadelTrue model, mainly because of its teardrop shape and medium balance.
Is the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 good for beginners?
It rates 42 out of 100 for forgiveness. That is a middle value, workable for an improving player. The manufacturer lists its level as "Avanzado – Profesional".
Is the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 arm-friendly?
It rates 40 out of 100 for comfort, a rating built from core firmness, face material, balance and weight, describing feel and physical demand. That is mid-range. This describes the build, it is not medical advice.
How much does the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 cost?
€350 on siuxpadel.com when checked on 28 October 2026.
How much does the Siux Electra Pro RL 2.0 2026 weigh?
The published weight is 355 to 375 g (12.5 to 13.2 oz).
How this site makes money, and how it does not. PadelTrue may earn a commission when you buy through a retailer link on this site. A commission never changes a rating. Every rating comes from the manufacturer's published specification through the formula printed on the methodology page, and every specification links to where it was published. Found a wrong figure? Send the source and it gets corrected.